{"id":77514,"date":"2026-08-17T10:56:02","date_gmt":"2026-08-17T15:56:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/2026\/08\/17\/pro-life-publisher-facing-demands-to-retract-calling-abortion-killing-fires-back-the-answer-is-no\/"},"modified":"2026-08-17T10:56:02","modified_gmt":"2026-08-17T15:56:02","slug":"pro-life-publisher-facing-demands-to-retract-calling-abortion-killing-fires-back-the-answer-is-no","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/2026\/08\/17\/pro-life-publisher-facing-demands-to-retract-calling-abortion-killing-fires-back-the-answer-is-no\/","title":{"rendered":"Pro-life publisher facing demands to retract calling abortion \u2018killing\u2019 fires back: \u2018The answer is No\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>EXCLUSIVE:<\/strong> A prominent pro-life organization is refusing demands to remove years of abortion-related reporting and to issue sweeping retractions after attorneys representing 13 abortion-rights advocates accused it of publishing false and defamatory claims about their pregnancies.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The answer is \u2018No,\u2019&#8221; attorneys for Live Action wrote in a fiery response obtained exclusively by Fox News Digital ahead of its public release Monday.<\/p>\n<p>The Thomas More Society, representing Live Action, argues that much of the disputed coverage is <a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/category\/us\/personal-freedoms\/first-amendment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">constitutionally protected speech<\/a>, including the organization&#8217;s use of terms such as &#8220;killing&#8221; to describe abortion, and signals that it is prepared to defend Live Action in court if the dispute escalates.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/politics\/supreme-court-unanimously-slaps-down-blue-state-targeting-pro-life-group\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>SUPREME COURT UNANIMOUSLY SLAPS DOWN BLUE STATE TARGETING PRO-LIFE GROUP<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Live Action will not cease reporting on abortion,&#8221; the response says, rejecting demands to delete its archive, publish sweeping retractions or agree to restrictions on future coverage.<\/p>\n<p>Peter Breen, executive vice president and head of litigation at Thomas More Society, told Fox News Digital that he believes the dispute raises a fundamental free-speech issue.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The other side&#8217;s argument is that somehow, by using the word kill or calling abortion killing, that you have a problem that you can create that could then be remedied in court,&#8221; Breen said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The issue is every single final court decision to deal with this has previously said that&#8217;s not defamatory,&#8221; he added. &#8220;It&#8217;s not legally wrong to call abortion killing.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/media\/babylon-bee-sues-new-mexico-officials-law-requiring-ai-disclaimers-political-satire\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>BABYLON BEE SUES NEW MEXICO OFFICIALS OVER LAW REQUIRING AI DISCLAIMERS ON POLITICAL SATIRE<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Amplify Legal&#8217;s July 15 <a href=\"https:\/\/abortioninamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Live-Action-Demand-Letter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">cease-and-desist<\/a>, however, alleges that the dispute goes beyond Live Action&#8217;s use of terms such as &#8220;killing.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Amplify, which represents 13 people featured in Live Action coverage, <a href=\"https:\/\/abortioninamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Live-Action-Demand-Letter.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">accused the outlet<\/a> of publishing false factual claims about their pregnancies, fetal diagnoses and medical circumstances and demanded that Live Action remove articles and social media posts and issue a public apology and retractions.<\/p>\n<p>Amplify Legal responded Monday, telling Fox News Digital that its objections concern statements it says Live Action made about families facing wanted pregnancies.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Live Action has repeatedly accused grieving families with wanted pregnancies of \u2018wanting to kill\u2019 their babies. These statements are both inaccurate and cruel,&#8221; Amplify Legal said in a statement to Fox News Digital.<\/p>\n<p>Asked whether Amplify intends to sue following Live Action&#8217;s rejection of its demands, the group stopped short of committing to litigation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As our clients\u2019 lawyers, we will be weighing all of their options,&#8221; the statement said.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/politics\/surrogate-gives-birth-texas-baby-heart-defect-parents-requested-abortion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>SURROGATE GIVES BIRTH IN TEXAS TO BABY WITH HEART DEFECT AFTER PARENTS REQUESTED ABORTIO<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Among the examples cited by Amplify is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/first-lady-jill-biden-invites-texas-woman-sought-illegal-abortion-state-union-address\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Kate Cox<\/a>, a Texas woman who <a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/politics\/surrogate-gives-birth-texas-baby-heart-defect-parents-requested-abortion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">sought an abortion<\/a> after her unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18. Amplify says Live Action repeatedly disputed whether the diagnosis meant Cox&#8217;s daughter was certain to die.<\/p>\n<p>Cox, whose case made national headlines after she asked the Texas Supreme Court for permission to obtain an abortion was denied and later left the state to have the procedure, was a guest of former first lady Jill Biden at the 2024 State of the Union Address.<\/p>\n<p>Amplify further says Live Action failed to contact its clients or their medical providers for comment before publication.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The lying, bullying, and complete disregard for the truth must end now,&#8221; Amplify Litigation Director Molly Duane said when announcing the demand in July. &#8220;What they are doing is not only cruel \u2014 it&#8217;s illegal.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/media\/gop-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-strengthen-first-amendment-protections-street-preachers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>GOP LAWMAKERS URGE SUPREME COURT TO STRENGTHEN FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS FOR STREET PREACHERS<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Live Action&#8217;s attorneys dispute Amplify&#8217;s allegations, but say the organization remains willing to consider specific factual challenges through its normal editorial corrections process.<\/p>\n<p>Courts have previously confronted similar rhetoric in the abortion debate.<\/p>\n<p>In a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.txcourts.gov\/media\/1455920\/210978_211039.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">2023 case cited<\/a> by the Thomas More Society, the Texas Supreme Court considered statements by an anti-abortion activist who characterized abortion-rights organizations as criminal and equated abortion with murder.<\/p>\n<p>The court held that the challenged statements were &#8220;protected opinion about abortion law made in pursuit of changing that law,&#8221; placing them &#8220;at the heart of protected speech under the <a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/category\/us\/personal-freedoms\/bill-of-rights\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">United States and Texas Constitutions<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The court also cited a 1988 Illinois appellate decision, Van Duyn v. Smith, rejecting a defamation claim involving a poster that used the term &#8220;prenatal killing&#8221; to describe abortion.<\/p>\n<p>Ilya Shapiro, director of constitutional studies at the <a href=\"https:\/\/manhattan.institute\/person\/ilya-shapiro?shown=10\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Manhattan Institute<\/a>, told Fox News Digital that he believes Amplify&#8217;s demand runs headlong into <a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/category\/politics\/judiciary\/political-rights\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">First Amendment protections for political debate<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/politics\/gop-rising-star-demands-abortion-advocate-name-favorite-method-hearing-clash\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\"><strong>GOP RISING STAR DEMANDS ABORTION ADVOCATE NAME \u2018FAVORITE\u2019 METHOD IN HEARING CLASH<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Amplify Legal&#8217;s demand letter is legally frivolous activism,&#8221; Shapiro said. &#8220;One side says \u2018abortion is murder.\u2019 The other side says denying women the right to abortion takes us to a dystopian Handmaid&#8217;s Tale. These are opinions, and opinions by definition aren&#8217;t defamatory.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Shapiro went further, arguing that describing an abortion as &#8220;killing&#8221; does not become defamatory merely because the terminology is fiercely disputed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In short, you can&#8217;t criminalize or make someone civilly liable for the standard give and take of <a href=\"https:\/\/foxnews.com\/category\/opinion\/culture-opinion\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">heated political debate<\/a>,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Lila Rose, Live Action founder and president, told Fox News Digital that the organization would not change its language in response to the threatened legal action.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Abortion is an act of killing. It deliberately ends the life of a living human child,&#8221; Rose said. &#8220;Americans have every right to say that openly and forcefully, without fear of being dragged into court for refusing to adopt the deceptive language preferred by abortion activists.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Rose said the organization would continue using such language regardless of the legal threat.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Threats will not stop us from calling abortion what it is or from fighting for the right of every child to live,&#8221; she said. &#8220;We will keep fighting, and we will win.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The letter warns that Live Action could seek attorneys&#8217; fees and sanctions if a lawsuit is filed and directs Amplify and its clients to preserve potentially relevant records and communications.<\/p>\n<p>Asked whether the Thomas More Society was effectively telling Amplify and its clients, &#8220;Go ahead, sue us,&#8221; Breen stopped short of inviting a lawsuit, but didn&#8217;t back away.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Certainly, the courthouse door is open,&#8221; Breen told Fox News Digital.<\/p>\n<p>Breen said the Thomas More Society does not want its clients dragged into litigation, but is confident in Live Action&#8217;s position.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re not going to back down from that,&#8221; he said. &#8220;If it comes, we will be very, very well-prepared.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Amplify, for its part, told Fox News Digital that it is &#8220;weighing all of [its clients&#8217;] options.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For Breen, the next move belongs to Amplify.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The ball is in the other side&#8217;s court,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>EXCLUSIVE: A prominent pro-life organization is refusing demands to remove years of abortion-related reporting and to issue sweeping retractions after attorneys representing 13 abortion-rights advocates accused it of publishing false and defamatory claims about their pregnancies. &#8220;The answer is \u2018No,\u2019&#8221; attorneys for Live Action wrote in a fiery response obtained exclusively by Fox News Digital &#8230; <a title=\"Pro-life publisher facing demands to retract calling abortion \u2018killing\u2019 fires back: \u2018The answer is No\u2019\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/2026\/08\/17\/pro-life-publisher-facing-demands-to-retract-calling-abortion-killing-fires-back-the-answer-is-no\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Pro-life publisher facing demands to retract calling abortion \u2018killing\u2019 fires back: \u2018The answer is No\u2019\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77514"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77514\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/news2shorts.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}